No single point of view has the truth, but truth does exist. Truth exists in the incorporation of all points of view into a unified, cohesive meta-unit.
http://nmc.loyola.edu/intro/postmod/table.htm (For a reference to what Modernism and Postmodernism are, follow this link)
Modernism (~1890-1950) was a general movement in thought, art, philosophy, humanities, etc. that arose during the first half of the 20th century. One of its primary features is its insistence that there is a singular idea or means that is the absolute truth. People began claiming their personal truths as the "end-all, be all", absolute truth... all other approaches are "wrong". This duality of right/wrong ways to truth is problematic.
Postmodernism (~1950-1990) was the reaction to modernism. It's defining characteristic was the claim that there is no absolute truth, that everything is relative, and to seek for truth is a futile act because it doesn't exist. The question that arises is this: if there is no truth, then what's the point of doing anything? Human values and culture descend into nihilism, meaninglessness, and purposelessness. An additional gaping hole is the fact that postmodernism is self-negating: if every idea is relative, postmodernism should be just as relative too. After such a conclusion, what value does the idea of postmodernism hold? Why bother even talking about it?
Metamodernism (1990-now) is the balance point between those two ideas. It takes the idea of truth from modernism and combines it with the relativity of postmodernism: all ideas are approaches to truth, but the truth cannot be found through one idea alone.
The concepts of Modernism/Postmodernism/Me
Since the 1990's, people have been trying to figure out what the current cultural-thought trend is all about. Now that it's begun to clarify as it emerges from the overlap era with postmodernism, I'm sure we can expect to see manifestations of metamodernism with increasing frequency over the next few decades. I think it's beautiful.
No comments:
Post a Comment